AI solution architecture
Who it's for
Technology leaders, enterprise architects, IT leadership and data teams at large organizations, mid-size companies and public bodies who must choose, justify or review an AI architecture; SMBs starting a structuring project.
Typical problem
“Three vendors are proposing three different solutions, our proof of concept doesn't pass the enterprise architecture review, and nobody can justify the costs.”
What we do
- Reference architecture: RAG, agents, model gateway, guardrails and logging.
- Choice of models and hosting, compared in writing: cloud (Azure AI Foundry, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock) or local and sovereign, depending on data sensitivity.
- Integration with enterprise systems: Microsoft 365 and Copilot, ERP and CRM, data platforms.
- Security and identity: Entra ID, managed identities, private networking, least-privilege access.
- Non-functional requirements: operating costs (FinOps), latency, availability, observability.
- Architecture dossier, architecture decision records (ADRs) and architecture review of an existing AI project.
- Proof of concept on your data when the choice needs to be validated.
Deliverables
- Architecture dossier: C4 diagrams, components, data flows, security and identity.
- Architecture decision records (ADRs).
- Written comparison of options: models, hosting, estimated operating costs.
- Criteria for evaluating answer quality.
- Architecture review report and prioritized recommendations, for an existing project.
- Proof of concept, if applicable.
Proof
L1 — Measured sovereign RAG and L4 — The same RAG on Azure: the same solution built twice to compare the options against written criteria. L2 — Enterprise AI gateway: several models governed in one place.